[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bignum branch
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bignum branch |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:45:13 +0300 |
> From: Andy Moreton <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 21:49:46 +0100
>
> c:/msys64/mingw64/include/gmp.h has this (package version 6.1.2-1):
>
> /* Instantiated by configure. */
> #if ! defined (__GMP_WITHIN_CONFIGURE)
> #define _LONG_LONG_LIMB 1
> #define __GMP_LIBGMP_DLL 0
> #endif
>
> That is suitable for linking to a static library. If I change it to look
> like this:
>
> /* Instantiated by configure. */
> #if ! defined (__GMP_WITHIN_CONFIGURE)
> #define _LONG_LONG_LIMB 1
> #define __GMP_LIBGMP_DLL 1
> #endif
>
> After rebuilding emacs, logcount works, and data-tests passes.
I'd actually prefer us to link against GMP statically, at least on
Windows, because GMP usually gets replaced when you install a new
version of GCC. So linking statically runs a lower risk of a "DLL
hell". It also makes the Emacs binary self-contained and more easily
movable.
Why is it a problem with linking statically against GMP? Could it be
tat your libgmp.a is from a different GMP version, i.e. incompatible
with the GMP headers you have installed? Or maybe some other optional
library depends on GMP and causes conflicts? If not, I don't
understand why the results should depend on how we linked the library.
Thanks.
- Re: bignum branch, (continued)
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Stefan Monnier, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/08
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/08
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/08
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/10
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/10
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/10
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/10
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/11
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/11
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/11
- Re: bignum branch, Stefan Monnier, 2018/08/11
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/11
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/10