Re: latin-prefix input method niggles

[Robert Pluim]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> I think we should make latin-prefix be consistent with latin-postfix.
> Each one of the above is correct in the latter, AFAICT, so we should
> just fix the problems in latin-prefix.  E.g., ~a should produce both ã
> and ă, ~c should produce č, and ġ should be produced by .g.  I see no
> reason to have these two behave inconsistently; do you?

.g already produces ġ, changing ~c to produce č is easy. I take it
youʼre ok with adding ,c -> ç

*time passes* I hadn't realised you could define multiple productions
 for the same mapping. So we instead end up with

~c -> ç
~c -> č
~a -> ã
~a -> ă

in that order, since that keeps the current latin-prefix mappings of
~c and ~a first. We could also add ,c -> ç for consistency with
latin-postfix.

Robert