Re: latin-prefix input method niggles

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:36:01 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I think we should make latin-prefix be consistent with latin-postfix.
> > Each one of the above is correct in the latter, AFAICT, so we should
> > just fix the problems in latin-prefix.  E.g., ~a should produce both ã
> > and ă, ~c should produce č, and ġ should be produced by .g.  I see no
> > reason to have these two behave inconsistently; do you?
> 
> .g already produces ġ, changing ~c to produce č is easy. I take it
> youʼre ok with adding ,c -> ç

Yes, because it'd be consistent with latin-postfix.

> *time passes* I hadn't realised you could define multiple productions
>  for the same mapping. So we instead end up with
> 
> ~c -> ç
> ~c -> č
> ~a -> ã
> ~a -> ă
> 
> in that order, since that keeps the current latin-prefix mappings of
> ~c and ~a first. We could also add ,c -> ç for consistency with
> latin-postfix.

Right.