emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ELPA] New package: xr


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: xr
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:05:42 +0200

> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 22:38:00 -0500
> 
>   > And if that is not enough for some reason, then what exactly should
>   > the contributor of a package say, and where, to express such a
>   > statement?
> 
> I expect that saying "my file foo is a change to Emacs" is enough.

Saying where?

>   > Also, there are packages distributed with Emacs which can be
>   > considered not "clearly" a change to Emacs -- should the same policy
>   > be used for them?  E.g., Gnus or Org or ERC -- they are add-ons that
>   > have no direct effect on the Emacs core.
> 
> We treat ERC, Gnus and Org Mode as parts of Emacs for copyright purposes.

I know, but what I don't understand is how ERC etc. are different from
a package stored on ELPA.  Could you please clarify the difference, if
there is one?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]