[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new-flex-completion-style
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: new-flex-completion-style |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:30:21 +0000 |
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 5:49 PM Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Tho the equivalent regexp I'm using here is ".*a.*b.*c.*" not "a.*b.*c"
> > as your page states.
> With Icicles regexp matching for completion you don't need the
> initial `.*'.
Let me state it another way. Does your system match "foo"
to "barfoobaz" or does it fail? If so, then I think your
_equivalent_ regexp is probably .*f.*o.*o.*
> I don't use any scoring for scatter matching.
> Icicle users usually have a bunch of sort orders they can use
Right. Which one do you use, when you use scatter-matching?
João
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, (continued)
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, Daniel Pittman, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, João Távora, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, João Távora, 2019/02/14
- RE: new-flex-completion-style, Drew Adams, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, João Távora, 2019/02/14
- RE: new-flex-completion-style, Drew Adams, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style,
João Távora <=
- RE: new-flex-completion-style, Drew Adams, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, João Távora, 2019/02/14
- RE: new-flex-completion-style, Drew Adams, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, João Távora, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/14
- RE: new-flex-completion-style, Drew Adams, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/02/15
- RE: new-flex-completion-style, Drew Adams, 2019/02/15
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, João Távora, 2019/02/18