[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab |
Date: |
Mon, 13 May 2019 14:24:12 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
On 2019-05-13 10:51, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> Cc: Alex Gramiak
>> <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>> address@hidden, address@hidden Date: Mon, 13 May
>> 2019 06:32:21 +0200
>>
>> Yesterday, after writing the above, I've checked out the gtk
>> project and enabled Magit/Forge on it. The initial fetch of the
>> topics (~1900 issues and ~800 merge requests) took about two hours,
>> but contrary to what has been reported in another message in this
>> thread, it did not crash and indicated its progess in the mode-line
>> (something like pulling 1211/1871 Issues).
>
> 1900 issues is about an order of magnitude less than what we have,
> AFAIU, so 2 hours is quite a lot. Also, I'm not sure Clément tried
> this DB, perhaps he tried a larger one.
Correct: I tried a larger one (77'000 `topics', i.e. 50 thousand issues and 27
thousand patch discussions).
Jonas, the creator of forge, reports in the Github discussion
(https://github.com/magit/ghub/issues/87) that fetching problems are usually
due to intermittent connectivity issues, and that retrying sometimes fixes
them. Here is an extra bit of relevant information [this is in reply to Toon
inquiring about GraphQL]:
> Fetching the needed data from Github using GraphQL [this is the
> protocol I mentionned earlier] is much faster than fetching it from
> Gitlab using REST. I don't remember exactly but I think that what
> would take ten minutes for Github would take hours for Gitlab. I
> would like Forge to be usable for projects like Emacs itself but it
> is still early days and a lot has to be done before that is really
> feasible. With GraphQL it would become possible at least, but the
> initial fetch might still take hours anyway. Regardless of what you
> do (and I would very much welcome GraphQL support) I think ghub/forge
> has to learn to do sparse clones, just like git did.
- Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab, (continued)
- Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab, Alex Gramiak, 2019/05/11
- Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/11
- Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab, Alex Gramiak, 2019/05/11
- Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/12
- Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab, Tassilo Horn, 2019/05/12
- Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/12
- Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab, Tassilo Horn, 2019/05/13
- Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/13
- Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab,
Clément Pit-Claudel <=
- [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker (was: [RFE] Migration to gitlab), Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/13
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker (was: [RFE] Migration to gitlab), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/13
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/13
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/05/13
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/13
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker, Tassilo Horn, 2019/05/13
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker, Tassilo Horn, 2019/05/13
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker, Tassilo Horn, 2019/05/13
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/13
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker, Toon Claes, 2019/05/14