[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/admin/notes/copyright, v [EMACS_22_BASE]
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/admin/notes/copyright, v [EMACS_22_BASE] |
Date: |
Sun, 13 May 2007 19:46:27 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /sources/emacs
Module name: emacs
Branch: EMACS_22_BASE
Changes by: Glenn Morris <gm> 07/05/13 19:46:27
Index: copyright
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/emacs/emacs/admin/notes/copyright,v
retrieving revision 1.79.2.1
retrieving revision 1.79.2.2
diff -u -b -r1.79.2.1 -r1.79.2.2
--- copyright 28 Apr 2007 19:23:08 -0000 1.79.2.1
+++ copyright 13 May 2007 19:46:26 -0000 1.79.2.2
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@
the concept.
rms: "My understanding is that game rules as such are not copyrightable."
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-01/msg00960.html>
+ rms: Legal advice is that we are ok and need not worry about this.
lispref/doclicense.texi
man/doclicense.texi
@@ -405,6 +406,7 @@
Accordingly, FSF copyright was added.
src/unexhp9k800.c (and dependent src/m/sr2k.h)
+ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-02/msg00138.html
- briefly removed due to legal uncertainly Jan-Mar 2007. The
relevant assignment is under "hp9k800" in copyright.list. File was
written by John V. Morris at HP, and disclaimed by the author and
@@ -425,6 +427,14 @@
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-04/msg01427.html
+lisp/progmodes/python.el
+Dave Love alerted us to a potential legal problem:
+http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2007-04/msg00459.html
+
+On consultation with a lawyer, we found there was no problem:
+http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-05/msg00466.html
+
+
** Issues that are "fixed" for the release of Emacs 22, but we may
wish to revisit later in more detail
@@ -549,9 +559,6 @@
Emacs 22 is released (though if they can be fixed before, that is
obviously good):
-Maybe some relevant comments here?
-<http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.legal/browse_thread/thread/123547ea95437a1f>
-
Is it OK to just `cvs remove' a file for legal reasons, or is
something more drastic needed? A removed file is still available from
@@ -586,16 +593,9 @@
Done: TUTORIAL.eo
-REMOVED src/unexhp9k800.c
- - we would like to re-add this file if possible. Please let us know
- if you can clarify its legal status.
- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-02/msg00138.html
-
-
*** These are copyright issues still to be addressed:
-python.el potential legal problem
-http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2007-04/msg00459.html
+None known.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/admin/notes/copyright, v [EMACS_22_BASE],
Glenn Morris <=