emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] master ce48658: Fix command repetition with lexical-bindin


From: Noam Postavsky
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] master ce48658: Fix command repetition with lexical-binding (Bug#29334)
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 21:55:39 -0500 (EST)

branch: master
commit ce48658191befb7734a7af484e368af5ed8b9447
Author: Noam Postavsky <address@hidden>
Commit: Noam Postavsky <address@hidden>

    Fix command repetition with lexical-binding (Bug#29334)
    
    `call-interactively' relies on analyzing the source of `interactive'
    forms in order to preserve arguments like (region-end) in the command
    history, rather than just storing the resulting position.  However,
    the byte-compiler does not preserve the source of the interactive form
    when lexical-binding is in effect, because `call-interactively' would
    evaluate the form with dynamic binding in that case.
    
    To fix this, change `call-interactively' so that it checks compiled
    functions for lexical-binding as well.  Then the byte-compiler can
    preserve the source of interactive forms regardless of the value of
    lexical-binding.
    
    * src/callint.c (Fcall_interactively): Functions compiled with
    lexical-binding have their arglist encoded as an integer, use this to
    choose the right kind of binding for compiled functions too.
    * lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el (byte-compile-lambda): Preserve the
    uncompiled form of the interactive form when lexical-binding is
    enabled too.
---
 lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el | 6 +-----
 src/callint.c               | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
index 2f5f9f8..564aac2 100644
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
@@ -2839,11 +2839,7 @@ for symbols generated by the byte compiler itself."
                 (while (consp (cdr form))
                   (setq form (cdr form)))
                 (setq form (car form)))
-              (if (and (eq (car-safe form) 'list)
-                        ;; The spec is evalled in callint.c in dynamic-scoping
-                        ;; mode, so just leaving the form unchanged would mean
-                        ;; it won't be eval'd in the right mode.
-                        (not lexical-binding))
+              (if (eq (car-safe form) 'list)
                   nil
                 (setq int `(interactive ,newform)))))
            ((cdr int)
diff --git a/src/callint.c b/src/callint.c
index c713e08..dcda0bc 100644
--- a/src/callint.c
+++ b/src/callint.c
@@ -357,7 +357,9 @@ invoke it.  If KEYS is omitted or nil, the return value of
       /* Compute the arg values using the user's expression.  */
       specs = Feval (specs,
                     CONSP (funval) && EQ (Qclosure, XCAR (funval))
-                    ? CAR_SAFE (XCDR (funval)) : Qnil);
+                     ? CAR_SAFE (XCDR (funval))
+                     : COMPILEDP (funval) && INTEGERP (AREF (funval, 
COMPILED_ARGLIST))
+                     ? Qt : Qnil);
       if (events != num_input_events || !NILP (record_flag))
        {
          /* We should record this command on the command history.  */



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]