[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

From: Jason F. McBrayer
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:28:18 -0400

On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 23:21 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:

> > On Mar 21, 2007, at 15:27, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
> >
> >> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:

> >> All I really need it for is multiple DONE states (e.g. COMPLETED
> >> vs. CANCELLED).  The current implementation works okay for that,
> >> though it's somewhat overkill.
> >
> > Not so bad, maybe:
> >

This is, in fact, more or less what I'm doing.  Actually I have one
sequence for actions, one for projects, and one for unusual states (like
CANCELLED);  I'm finding more uses for it as time goes on.   So the
extra flexibility is more than I actually need, but not so much that I
can't see any use for it.

I would like to see this settable in lisp, though, since I want to use
my TODO keywords all across my GTD system rather than different ones in
different files.  I can probably try to put together a patch to do this
tomorrow, just so that I'm not kibitzing without offering code.

> Or maybe this should actually be like this:?

I don't think an extra syntax would be too worthwhile.  If you're
already setting TODO keywords in the file itself, three lines vs. one
line is not a big deal.

| Jason F. McBrayer                    address@hidden  |
| If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in |
| battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one |
| is the greatest of all conquerors.  --- The Dhammapada    |

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]