|
From: | Carsten Dominik |
Subject: | Re: [Orgmode] FR: Using properties to customize global settings on a per-entry basis |
Date: | Sat, 6 Oct 2007 08:52:07 +0200 |
On Oct 5, 2007, at 22:34, John Wiegley wrote:
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:I think using LOGGING is a bit better.So what do I do? More votes?If you want to start using the facility for generally overriding Lisp values, then your original proposal is better. But if this is just going to be for a few exceptions, LOGGING fits much better with the present scheme and docs.
Generally overriding Lisp values would be a great feature, but I feel that this implementation seems to promise that you can set any lisp value there. This would lead to a large overhead, because every command would have to locally parse before execution. Also there would be uncertainties because many commands
act on several items etc. I am not yet convinced that this is useful enough - so for the time being I will stick with the LOGGING property. Thanks for all comments! - Carsten
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |