[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: FR: source code
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: FR: source code |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:55:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) |
"Eddward DeVilla" <address@hidden> writes:
>> ,----
>> | #+BEGIN_HTML
>> | #+BEGIN_LaTeX
>> | #+BEGIN_TXT
>> | #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
>> | #+BEGIN myblock
>> `----
>
> I know. I don't care for these. There really only useful if you are
> exporting.
For the #+BEGIN_* you're right. But dynamic blocks are useful for doing
anything (clock reports, etc.) - not only exporting.
> (By that I mean they are ugly (in my opinion) in the org-buffer.)
Ugly but useful :/
> I'd rather see a way to mark things up so they are meaningful in the
> buffer as well as export.
Hence my proposal to refactor these directives and only use the dynamic
block feature. When a block should be dynamically handled would depend
on the associated function, not on the directive itself.
> I may be a little quick on the knee jerk. In buffer markup recently
> got a little weaker and I'd like for it not to be over looked with the
> expectation that you can just use inline html or latex.
Right, understood!
--
Bastien
Re: [Orgmode] FR: source code, Carsten Dominik, 2008/01/16
- Re: [Orgmode] FR: source code, Phil Jackson, 2008/01/16
- Re: [Orgmode] FR: source code, Carsten Dominik, 2008/01/18
- Re: [Orgmode] FR: source code, Phil Jackson, 2008/01/18
- Re: [Orgmode] FR: source code, Phil Jackson, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Orgmode] FR: source code, Rick Moynihan, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Orgmode] FR: source code, Russell Adams, 2008/01/29