[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs
From: |
Michael Sperber |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:00:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.5-b29 (darwin) |
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> The compromise for me would be this:
>
> - You fix the things above.
> - I leave the rest of the necessary compatibility code in
> - I program any new features with whatever is available
> in Emacs 22/23 and rely on you to make it XEmacs compatible.....
That would be wonderful. I'll see that the issues are addressed:
> 1. posix character classes in regular expressions, thinks like [:alpha:]
> These are nice because they work well with arbitrary languages.
> Does XEmacs suppor these now?
No, but I'll see to it that they are.
> 2. The overlay API - I think XEmacs actually has a compatibility lib
> for these, is that correct?
Correct.
> One of the things you could do it to figure out if I can also switch
> to the API calls overlays-in and overlays-at in that library.
You should, anyway: I'll take care of any problems. I take it something
about these didn't work for you in the past: If that is so, a sentence
or two on what those problems were would be much appreciated.
> 3. outline.el. Last time looked, XEmacs still had the horrible old
> outline.el which is pretty much impossible to program.
> I do have a port, xemacs/noutline.el in the Org distribution - if you
> could get that into XEmacs, that would get rid of a major annoyance,
> including complicated installation instructions.
I'm working on this right now - should be no big problem. A few minor
incompatibilities with our current outline.el need to be addressed, but
I'm working on them.
> 4. Can you make XEmacs understand mouse-3 instead of button3 ? Or
> maybe it does understand these by now?
No; I'll try to get this in.
Won't all happen overnight, but I'm getting to work on it. I very much
appreciate your willingness to help!
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Jan Böcker, 2010/04/16
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Günter Kolousek, 2010/04/16
[Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Michael Sperber, 2010/04/17
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/17
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Michael Sperber, 2010/04/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs,
Michael Sperber <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Michael Sperber, 2010/04/19
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/19
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Michael Sperber, 2010/04/19
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/19
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/19
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Michael Sperber, 2010/04/23
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/23