[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Orgmode] Poll: Who is using these commands

From: Scott Randby
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Poll: Who is using these commands
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 15:22:03 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4

On 05/09/2010 07:43 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:

On May 9, 2010, at 12:03 AM, Scott Randby wrote:

On 05/08/2010 04:22 PM, Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs wrote:
Carsten Dominik schrieb:
I am wondering:

How many of your are using these keys

C-c C-f
C-c C-b
C-c C-n
C-c C-p

Never. I always use the speed commands since they became available.

The problem I have with speed commands is that, according to the
manual, they only work "when the cursor is at the beginning of a
headline." I need commands that work when the cursor is anywhere on
the headline.

Hi Scott,

what do you think about C-M-f, C-M-b, C-M-n, C-M-p as alternative bindings?
These seem to make *a lot* of sense, because, as many here have pointed
they are so much better repeatable (Keep C-M- down, press the character.)

- Carsten

If you want to go with these, then C-c C-u and C-c C-j should also be changed. 
However, I am concerned that C-M-f, C-M-b, C-M-n, C-M-p, C-M-u, and C-M-j are 
already bound to other useful functions. I don't use these functions myself, 
but after looking over what they do, I can see that changing these bindings 
might interfere with the work of some.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]