[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

From: Carsten Dominik
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:26:45 +0200

Hi Sebastian,

On Oct 29, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:

Hi Carsten,

Thanks a lot to you (and all others who made this happen) for this beautiful
new version!!

Carsten Dominik wrote:
Lists handling

Due to changes made to lists, it is no longer possible to have a sublist, some text and then another sublist while still in the same top- level list
item, like in the following situation:

 - Some list
   + A first sublist
   + of two elements

   A text belonging to the top-level list

   + Then another sublist
   + and a second element in it
 - End of main list

Basically, it means that this entry for this entry (about Org Babel) from an old file of mine (update this morning) does not publish anymore the same way:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* How to view the results

- =C-c C-v C-v= (or =C-c C-v v=) -- View the expanded body of a code block.

- =C-c C-v C-z= -- Switch to the *session* of the current code block (first,
 you need to add =:session= to it).

 Use =C-u C-c C-v C-z= to bring up the session with the input variable

=C-c C-v z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session-with-code=) is a variant of =C-c
 C-v C-z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session=): instead of switching to the
 session buffer, it splits the window between:

 + the session buffer, and
 + a language major-mode edit buffer for the code block in question.

This can be convenient for using language major mode for interacting with
 the session buffer.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The last sentence is *not* considered part of the second element of the first

Although I've seen similar constructs in many, many documents, does anyone know enough rules of style to tell me if this is a wrong way to write things down? Or, does some possibility still exist to support this seamlessly?

It is not that this would be bad style. In fact I do miss this kind of structure as well, and accepting loosing it was the biggest argument against Nicolas' change.

However, the trade was for much greater stability and consistency of plain lists, Nicolas has done some great work here. Another issue was that the LaTeX exporter never had any support for these structures, so that was inconsistent for a long time.

- Carsten

Make footnotes work correctly in message-mode
The footnotes code now searches for the message delimiter "--" in order to place footnotes before the signature. Thanks to Tassilo Horn for this patch.

Just a detail: the delimiter is "-- " (space after the dashes).

Best regards,

Sébastien Vauban

Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.

- Carsten

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]