On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Julien Danjou
<address@hidden> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Alan L Tyree wrote:
> The development list wouldn't be very interesting without the intense
> interaction that it now has with users. The org list seems unique in
> this, at least for the lists that I have sometimes monitored.
No, really, it's not that unique. And many project still works correctly
with several mailing list.
I know that most projects work this way, and I am sure that Org would survive and prosper no matter what the decision is here. I still say, of the lists that I have monitored (not many - I am a retired Law Professor with only a slight knowledge of software development) the Org list is the most interesting.
It's just a personal preference - I don't see any decisive argument for any of the possible decisions on splitting the list.
Whatever happens, many thanks to all the Org developers for some great software.
Cheers,
Alan
--
Julien Danjou
❱ http://julien.danjou.info