|
From: | Christian Moe |
Subject: | Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results |
Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:01:02 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
Hi,Yes, these all checked out (assuming you meant the second one /should/ be exported -- as quoted code -- but not evaluated).
This is a nice addition, and rather cleaner and more intuitive than the workarounds I've been playing with. (Faking an inline call to block A with an inline src block B that takes a variable from calling A in the header args, and shortening it with a macro that expands to B...)
Yours, Christian On 6/27/11 7:43 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
I believe that I have fixed these issues. The following examples should now all export as described. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- The following exports as a normal call line #+call: double(it=1) Now here is an inline call call_double(it=1) stuck in the middle of some prose. This one should not be exported =call_double(it=2)= because it is quoted. Finally this next one should export, even though it starts a line call_double(it=3) because sometimes inline blocks fold with a paragraph. And, a call with raw results call_double(4)[:results raw] should not have quoted results. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |