[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Merge org-7.7 into emacs

From: Eric Schulte
Subject: Re: [O] Merge org-7.7 into emacs
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:26:48 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)


suvayu ali <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Memnon Anon
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Just a heads up:
>>       http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/142944
>> I don't know anything about this, but maybe something can be said/done
>> about it while Bastien enjoys his vacation?
> I see my name in there. I only submitted a small (touching less than 20
> lines) documentation patch[1]. Would I still need to sign the copyright
> assignment? If so, how do I initiate the process?

I believe 10 lines is the cutoff for whether a patch may be considered
"tiny" and thus whether it requires copyright attribution to the FSF.
I'm not sure if the same rules apply to documentation patches as to code

If you are willing to complete the FSF attribution process that would be
ideal and would cover you for any future contributions.  The steps are
described at.

>> Memnon
> Footnotes:
> [1] commit 71d871f96e3e916a9542daeb6d3b102a77d9b068
>     Author: Suvayu Ali <address@hidden>
>     Date:   Mon Jul 4 15:03:06 2011 +0200
>         Improve "Images in LaTeX export" documentation
>         * Mention use of keywords like multicolumn and float
>         * Remove previous mention of hack with placement option
>           as per comments on the mailing list. The hack is
>           better suited for Worg.
>      doc/org.texi |   34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
>      1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Eric Schulte

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]