[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [dev] org-indent-mode patch

From: Bernt Hansen
Subject: Re: [O] [dev] org-indent-mode patch
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:02:58 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)

Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:

> On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
>>> what has happened to this patch?  Did you stop it due to my questions?
>>> That was not my intention - so if you are convinced that it works well,
>>> it might be a good solution.
>>> On Jul 21, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>>> In order to circumvent the slow process at initialization, I've
>>>> implemented an asynchronous initialization. Thus, one can open the
>>>> buffer and start to write in it before initialization is complete. Once
>>>> it is done, everything else is synchronous again.
>>>> I think it is a good compromise. It needs testing though. Thus, if
>>>> anyone is interested, I'll gladly hear his feedback.
>>>> The branch is located at :
>>>>    git://github.com/ngz/org-mode-lists.git indent-patch-no-timer
>> It's still there. As I use neither Org indent mode nor Visual line mode,
>> feedback is important. Have you tried it since asynchronous
>> initialization implementation?  Does it solve the problems you raised?
>> Bernt Hansen has been testing it for a few weeks now. As far as I know,
>> he hasn't encountered any problem so far.
> Well, if Bernt has been testing is w/o problems, it probably works.
> I propose you push it into master, to make everyone use it - this
> will be a good way to find out if there are niches
> where it causes problems.

I've been using it for awhile and haven't noticed any issues with it.  I
use org-indent mode but I don't use visual line mode.  I've switched
back and forth between this branch and master a few times during my

I think incorporating it in master so it gets more exposure for testing
is a good idea.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]