emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] How to debug "Specified time is not representable"


From: Carsten Dominik
Subject: Re: [O] How to debug "Specified time is not representable"
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:13:02 +0200

On Oct 4, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Karl Voit wrote:

> * Jambunathan K <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>>>> A simple M-x grep-find on .org files for the year should work.
>>> 
>>> I do not know the year.
>> 
>> That is what regexps are for. 
> [...]
>> It is not my intention to provide you with a outright solution but only
>> to give sufficient hints so that you make progress.
> 
> :-)
> 
> Thanks. I know RegEx perfectly good. Irritating entries could be
> located by...
> 
>    find . -name "*\.org*"|xargs egrep '<19[0-6]|<20[3-9]'
> 
> ...since I am using *lots* of Orgmode files.
> 
> My point was more or less usability-related: what use is the message
> «Specified time is not representable» when the user (anybody, not
> just RegEx experts like us) gets no clue, where the problem is?
> 
> So I was curious, if there *is* some method I do not know (yet).
> 
> If the answer is «no, there is no way of telling you the actual time
> stamp that causes the message», my question is answered. Bad for
> Emacs/Orgmode usability

Fair enough.  If you pull, you should now get decent error messages.

- Carsten


> but fine with me so far.
> 
> So is this really the case?
> 
>>>> You may also try
>>>> M-x debug-on-entry RET ding RET
>>>> Look at the backtrace and see whether you can get some clues.
>>> 
>>> Sorry, no clue.
>>> 
>>>> Works best if your orgmode is not compiled
>>> 
>>> When I have compiled Orgmode, should I delete all *.elc files?
>> 
>> May be the debug-on-entry is the wrong strategy for the problem at
>> hand. You may disregard my suggestion.
> 
> -- 
> Karl Voit
> 
> 

- Carsten






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]