[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:37:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Bausch <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
>> named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
>> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
>> named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"
>
> what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ?
>
> That a table or list contains data is obvious. The only thing, the
> additional
> line is for, is to "name" it. That a source block contains source is also
> obvious and is already noted by the use of #+begin_src, so why duplicate the
> "src"-part?
>
> Daniel
I don't know if I've left it too late to vote on this but...
I would go for "name" for [1] and [3] and "call" for [2].
I can, however, see the need for distinguishing between data tables and
results so could be convinced that "data" and "results" should be used
for [3]. In any case, I do know that I dislike srcname and tblname...
--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.90.1
: using Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.452.g767f5)
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, (continued)
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/31
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/31
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords,
Eric S Fraga <=
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira, 2011/10/24
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Thorsten, 2011/10/21
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, suvayu ali, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Suvayu Ali, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/20