[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug: [patch] Fixes behavior of org-agenda-tree-to-indirect-buffe
From: |
Dave Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug: [patch] Fixes behavior of org-agenda-tree-to-indirect-buffer [7.8.02 (release_7.7.796.gc512)] |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:43:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.92 (darwin) |
on Sat Feb 25 2012, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:
> on Sat Feb 25 2012, David Maus <dmaus-AT-ictsoc.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> At Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:13 -1000,
>> Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>>
>>> [1 <text/plain (7bit)>]
>>>
>>>
>>> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
>>> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
>>>
>>> http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
>>>
>>> Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> This function was misbehaving in a number of ways. The enclosed patch
>>> represents the changes necessary to make it work properly, accumulated
>>> over several weeks of testing. Sorry if the description is a bit vague.
>>
>> Thanks for the patch. I implemented the first to modifications (handle
>> org-last-indirect-buffer being nil and window-live-p
>> indirect-window).
>
> Sorry, I can't parse that last sentence, and as a result I'm having
> trouble understanding the rest of the message.
>
>> These were indeed bugs or glitches.
>>
>> The third modification (set visibility according to property) is a new
>> feature. Currently org-tree-to-indirect buffer does not use the
>> VISIBILITY property but it makes sense to me to do so.
Well, new feature or not, org-tree-to-indirect-buffer stopped behaving
correctly for me when it was added, and I had to make adjustments.
>> I'll check this out and see to implement this.
Thanks.
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com