emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [bug?] org-e-latex; unexpected enumerate in export


From: Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala
Subject: Re: [O] [bug?] org-e-latex; unexpected enumerate in export
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:07:09 +0900
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux)

Hello Nicolas,

> I'm not talking about export, but filling. Can you fill correctly
> with -Q ? By "fill correctly" I mean that "2008." shouldn't be put at
> the beginning of a line unless it wasn't there already.

with emacs -Q (with org-mode release_7.9.2-584-g0421be)

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
The Model was initialized at 00 UTC 25 DEC 2008 to 00 UTC 28 DEC 2008. The 
initial and boundary conditions blah blah.  more blah
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

fill-paragraph (M-q) is filling following way (I think correctly).

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
The Model was initialized at 00 UTC 25 DEC 2008 to 00 UTC 28
DEC 2008. The initial and boundary conditions blah blah.  more blah
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

but when the paragraph

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
The Model was initialized at 00 UTC 25 DEC 2008 to 00 UTC 28 DEC
2008. The initial and boundary conditions blah blah.  more blah
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

fill-paragraph doesn't change anything. May be fill is also assuming the
second line as a list and correctly so.

I think the fault is with my English and writing habits. After several edits
in that paragraph It ended up having number and dot at the bol.  I think Its
just a watch-out case.

>>>Also, what is the value of `fill-nobreak-predicate' variable in that buffer?
>>
>> Its value is `nil'.
>
> That is the problem. It should contain at least
> `org-fill-paragraph-separate-nobreak-p' and
> `org-fill-line-break-nobreak-p' functions. 

>Do you have an idea why it doesn't?

I read it wrong earlier.

Sorry for ringing false alarm.

Thanks a lot.
-- 
ఎందరో మహానుభావులు అందరికి వందనములు
YYR



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]