|From:||Brian van den Broek|
|Subject:||Re: [O] clocking ongoing items|
|Date:||Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:26:15 -0500|
On 14 Dec 2012 01:52, "Rainer Stengele" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all!
> I wonder how others are clocking ongoing isues, which are not really todos but more like "issues" collecting clocked time for work done regularly.
> Example: Reading mail and organising daily priorities of tasks.
> This "todo" will not finish very soon.
> I want this item to be clocked daily but do not want it to look like a standard todo.
Why do you not want them as TODOs? I had thought I didn't but came to believe I was over-complicating things.
I have a number of daily and weekly tasks of this sort (these include your examples), and they are genuinely things I need to do :-) They have appropriate repeater cookies in the scheduled lines and it works just fine. Well enough that I've forgotten the reasons for which I resisted treating them as TODO items in the first place.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|