[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter
From: |
Aaron Ecay |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 01:07:09 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.15.2+43~ge848af8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
Hi again,
2013ko martxoak 19an, Aaron Ecay-ek idatzi zuen:
> I’m sorry, that was a mistake. I sent a patch to the HTML backend to
> enable this behavior, but forgot all about it. Then when I checked the
> code, it looked like the functionality was already there! I’ll follow
> up with Bastien about the patch, and see what its status is...
I was very confused when I wrote this. The patches I had in mind were
for a different issue. If
#+ATTR_HTML: :width 200
ever worked for me, it was only because of me hacking org into a
chimeric state. I guess you should continue to use
#+ATTR_HTML: width=200
or whatever the working incantation for HTML has traditionally been.
Sorry for the noise,
--
Aaron Ecay
- [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, John Hendy, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, John Hendy, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, Thomas S. Dye, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, John Hendy, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, Thomas S. Dye, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, Aaron Ecay, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter,
Aaron Ecay <=
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, John Hendy, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, Bastien, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, John Hendy, 2013/03/20
Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, Bastien, 2013/03/19