[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual
From: |
Achim Gratz |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:32:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
Am 22.03.2013 19:17, schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
You might want to use the (function (lambda ...)) form.
Why? (function (lambda ...)) is equivalent to (lambda ...). In fact,
`lambda' uses `function' as a subroutine.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Anonymous-Functions.html
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1852844/emacs-lisp-difference-between-function-lambda-and-lambda
With Emacs 24.3 and eager macro expoansion the need to do this has
diminished, but for the benefit of older Emacsen we should probably
continue the practise.
That's why I also suggest to drop the (mapcar 'org-trim ...) wrapper.
There's no reason to remove blanks if the user inserted them in the
first place.
Oh, OK - I did not realise that.
Since that's not costly to achieve, there no real reason not to support
it.
I'll trust you on the "not costly" part, I can't do any experiment right
now.
So, any objection (or further comment) for that change?
Please go ahead.
Regards,
--
Achim.
(on the road :-)
Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/21
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/22
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/22
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/22
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/22
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual,
Achim Gratz <=
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/23