[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] How to ensure code blocks are run during export?
From: |
Gareth Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [O] How to ensure code blocks are run during export? |
Date: |
Mon, 06 May 2013 16:18:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alan Schmitt <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>
>> I don't know OCaml at all, so I cannot try your example locally on my
>> machine.
>
> And I don't know about other languages that support sessions,
> unfortunately.
I can see something similar using haskell, if that helps:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
# -*- org-confirm-babel-evaluate: nil -*-
Setting the stage
#+BEGIN_SRC haskell :results code verbatim :exports results
let f = (+1)
f 1
#+END_SRC
Using the function
#+BEGIN_SRC haskell :results code verbatim :exports results
f 3
#+END_SRC
Setting another stage
#+BEGIN_SRC haskell :results silent :exports none
let g = (+1)
g 1
#+END_SRC
Using the second function
#+BEGIN_SRC haskell :results code verbatim :exports results
g 3
#+END_SRC
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> Though, you speak of "session": where is your session header argument? Isn't
>> that the problem?
>
> There is a default session for Caml code, so one does not need this
> argument.
In my example, the function f is declared in one block and successfully
used in the second. The function g is declared in a third (silent)
block, and results in an error when we try to call it in the fourth and
final block. Does this demonstrate the default "session" that Alan
mentioned?
G
Re: [O] How to ensure code blocks are run during export?, Eric Schulte, 2013/05/06