[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Extending org-contacts with properties: naming properties
From: |
Robert Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Extending org-contacts with properties: naming properties |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Aug 2013 06:43:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.9.5; emacs 24.2.1 |
Karl Voit writes:
> * David Rogers <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I agree that this kind of simple thing looks like a better
>> idea. However, it would also be nice to be able to call it some name
>> where a person who encounters the software capability but doesn't yet
>> know what it's for will understand what it's for just from reading the
>> name.
>
> This is my goal, yes.
>
>> "Given" is simple and sounds clear, but it doesn't say who did the
>> giving so the clarity is over-rated. "CustomerInfoIGaveThem" is a bit
>> long. :) (and TheirRecordOfMe is hardly any better.) :)
>
My first reaction was to use a short sentence like "itoldthem". I can't
think of any single english word that doesn't also need a subject to
describe which direction the transfer went.
R Horn