[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] State of the art in citations
From: |
Vikas Rawal Lists |
Subject: |
Re: [O] State of the art in citations |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:30:51 +0200 |
On 26-Apr-2014, at 6:56 pm, Clément B. <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> - Should I use biblatex instead of bibtex?
>
> You should. It is very powerful and straightforward. The manual
> is great.
>
Is the choice so clearcut?
A lot of bibliographic databases provide bibtex-compatible citation
information. How do you deal with that, when you shift to biblatex?
Of course, this is not an org-mode specific limitation at all. But still
relevant, I think, when we are discussing what should be the recommended way of
dealing with citations in org-mode.
Vikas
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, (continued)
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Leonard Randall, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Ken Mankoff, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Thomas S. Dye, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Ken Mankoff, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, John Kitchin, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Julian M. Burgos, 2014/04/28
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Julian M. Burgos, 2014/04/28
Re: [O] State of the art in citations,
Vikas Rawal Lists <=
Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Vikas Rawal Lists, 2014/04/29
Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27