[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Possible bug
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Possible bug |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 21:32:32 +0100 |
Hello,
Subhan Michael Tindall <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm not sure if this counts as a bug or not:
>
> If I run a custom agenda (eg. "R") with sticky agendas, it displays in an
> buffer with the name
> *Org Agenda (R)*
> If this buffer is then renamed to e.g.
> (rename-buffer "*R-Agenda*")
Why would you need that?
> *R-Agenda*
> And is then refreshed by hitting r, the agenda is properly rebuilt BUT in a
> new buffer named *Org Agenda(R)*, resulting in two differing agendas.
>
> Is this appropriate behavior? It seems that rebuilding the agenda
> should respect the current buffer name. I'm very new at programing for
> lisp, so I'm not sure I'm using the right functions here.
IIRC, sticky agenda relies on buffer names to know if agenda needs to be
updated. So, it is not a good idea to rename agenda buffers.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [O] Possible bug, Subhan Michael Tindall, 2015/03/10
- Re: [O] Possible bug,
Nicolas Goaziou <=