[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint'
From: |
Kyle Meyer |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint' |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:30:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Oleh Krehel <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Was the issue of abundant "Merge branch 'maint'" commit messages
> discussed before? I couldn't find a reference...
>
> It's not a big deal, really, but I personally prefer to have linear
> history with commits that actually do stuff. And it should be easy to
> switch to this style: just use the "rebase" instead of the "merge"
> command.
>
> Anyway, it's a small thing, and if Nicolas or Bastien strongly like the
> merge method I won't bring it up again. But if they don't care either
> way, I think it's better to start rebasing.
While I'm all for rebasing unpushed commits, short-lived feature
branches, and throw-away integration branches, your suggestion would
frequently rewrite the history of a long-lived public branch.
--
Kyle
- [O] Merge branch 'maint', Oleh Krehel, 2015/09/09
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint',
Kyle Meyer <=
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint', Oleh Krehel, 2015/09/10
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint', Robert Klein, 2015/09/10
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint', Kyle Meyer, 2015/09/10
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint', Oleh Krehel, 2015/09/11
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint', Josiah Schwab, 2015/09/11
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint', Oleh Krehel, 2015/09/11
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint', Stefan Nobis, 2015/09/11
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint', Oleh Krehel, 2015/09/11
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint', Achim Gratz, 2015/09/11
- Re: [O] Merge branch 'maint', Oleh Krehel, 2015/09/11