Re: [O] funny emacs-lisp macro behavior in org-babel related to lexical-binding

[Nicolas Goaziou]

John Kitchin <address@hidden> writes:

> That sounds fine to me. Would you then use
>
> :lexical nil

Sure. However, Babel uses "yes" and "no" as booleans so we also need to
support these. nil and t are fine too, obviously.

You would need to define a new defconst
`org-babel-header-args:emacs-lisp' to specify allowed values
for :lexical.

Also, this should probably be documented somewehere.


Regards,