Re: [O] abbreviations of link-type "file"

[Martin Carlé]

Thank your for taking up this quick posting.

While writing up the attached 'Exemple Complet Minimal', the
parsing turned out to work well.

Now only the :help-echo, not being triggered by an abbreviated link,
remains still an issue as demonstrated by the ECM below.


I shall consider your suggestion. However, I like the application-link
feature for its convenience not being forced to duplicate quite some
code in the :follow and :store functions.

Best,
mc

link_ECM.org
Description: Text Data

someFile.org
Description: Text Data

On 2016-08-21 Sun 09:32, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:

> Hello,
>
> mc <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> As we talk about link abbreviations, another issue might add some useful 
>> information:
>>
>> links of link-type "file" (e.g. "file+new-link"), if follow via an
>> abbreviation, is not parsed correctly:
>
> I suggest to avoid using so called "application" links, i.e.,
> type+application syntax as it may be ditched at some point. You can
> define a new link type instead, e.g., "newlink" or "applink".
>
> In any case, could you provide an ECM?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,


-- 
Fetch my gnupg key:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 7E3CA33F

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature