[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters
From: |
Eric Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:33:38 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
> Titus von der Malsburg <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Correct me if I’m wrong but there are a lot of things in Org that are
>> just about typesetting: *bold*, /italic/, _underlined_, =verbatim= and
>> ~code~, +strike-through+. Would you remove these things as well?
>
> I could argue that emphasis is not just about typesetting. It conveys
> a meaning. How emphasis is rendered _is_ typesetting, however. For
> example, "latex" and "beamer" export back-ends render bold text
> differently.
It's similar to how HTML went from <i> and <b> to <emph> and <strong>.
The former were presentation directives. The latter are semantic
directives. They're practically the same, for reasons of backwards
compatibility, and conceptual continuity. Org's emphasis markers are
similar -- they *look* like presentation directives, but at this point
they're actually used as semantic directives.
Probably not helpful,
Eric
- Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters, Titus von der Malsburg, 2017/02/03
- Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters, Eric S Fraga, 2017/02/03
- Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters, Titus von der Malsburg, 2017/02/03
- Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters, Rasmus, 2017/02/06
- Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters, Titus von der Malsburg, 2017/02/06
- Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters, Rasmus, 2017/02/09
- Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters, Titus von der Malsburg, 2017/02/10
- Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/02/10