emacs-pretest-bug
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: multilingual text in frame


From: Phillip Lord
Subject: Re: multilingual text in frame
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:02:46 +0000

>>>>> "Kenichi" == Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:

  Kenichi> In article <address@hidden>,
  Kenichi> Phillip Lord <address@hidden> writes:
  >>>>>>> "Kenichi" == Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
  Kenichi> In article <address@hidden>,
  Kenichi> Phillip Lord <address@hidden> writes: Then, please
  Kenichi> try the locale "es", "de", or "fr".
 
  >>>> I'm not sure if I did this 100% right, but I tried a Spanish
  >>>> locale (all the menu items were coming up in Spanish anyway),
  >>>> and it appears that Sawfish can not display non ASCII
  >>>> characters.

  Kenichi> Have you done that before running Sawfish?  I think Sawfish
  Kenichi> itself must run under Spanish locale.  If the menus of
  Kenichi> Sawfish are in Spanish, perhaps, it is running under
  Kenichi> Spanish locale.

  >> Yeah. I rebooted my machine, and logged in again.

  Kenichi> Hmmm, then I have no more ideas.

  Kenichi> I've just tried Sawfish (version 1.0.1) on GNU/Linux
  Kenichi> system, and found that it works correctly.  I did this:

  Kenichi> C-x C-m l latin-1 RET M-x set-frame-name RET a b c C-q 3 0
  Kenichi> 0 RET def RET

  Kenichi> Then, abcÀdef is correctly displayed in the title bar of
  Kenichi> Emacs.

  Kenichi> So, I think that at least Emacs is doing correct thing.

I think that you are correct. I was doing a little work on the
software I'm developing, which bought to light this problem in the
first place. The long and the short of it, is that on my home machine,
it does all appear to be working fine (I didn't notice this before,
because on the smaller screen at home, I normally have sawfish remove
the window frame to get some extra space for emacs). 

So, in short, I think this is not an emacs problem, but something
about the installation of redhat on my work machine. I shall
investigate further, but it does appear not to be emacs, and I fear
that I have been wasting peoples time, for which I apologise!

Cheers

Phil








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]