Re: utf-translate-cjk-mode

[Kai Großjohann]

Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> writes:

> Or did we decide that implementing `custom-setq' would make this
> irrelevant?  What did we exactly decide?

That's a very good question.  If there was a decision, I missed it.
Arguments have been exchanged already, so maybe now is the time for
Richard to say what he wants.

Personally, I'm happy with either of the following:

* Provide a way to allow people to write into their .emacs files Lisp
  statements that express "set variable foo to value bar using
  customize, and when you're asked to save all options, don't save
  the foo option to the custom-set-variables block as it is already
  expressed in the Lisp statement which I wrote to .emacs".

  I don't know whether custom-setq is the right name for this.

* Implement a coding standard that requires that there be a Lispish
  way for all settings that can be done via Customize, and that the
  Lispish way is documented with the Customize options, and that the
  Customize way is documented with the Lispish
  function/variable/whatever.

-- 
A preposition is not a good thing to end a sentence with.