[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad UI defaults
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: bad UI defaults |
Date: |
23 Apr 2003 18:17:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> * The changed behaviour of the blinking cursor -- solid and empty
> box, rather than solid and absent -- makes it hard to read the
> character under the cursor, at least with the font I use
> (lucidatypewriter-medium-*-normal-*-*-120).
>
> You can change that behavior, I believe.
Yes, but I was commenting on the default, which seems worse.
> I don't see that it makes text hard to read in the default font.
If I start up with no resources defined, I get
-Adobe-Courier-Medium-R-Normal--12-120-75-75-M-70-ISO8859-1
which looks similar for me.
> * The new mode-line order is worse IMO.
>
> In what way worse?
Because things I think are important get shunted of to the right, as
below.
> To me the time, mail status and
> battery status are important and shouldn't be shunted off the
> right. I don't care about the line number and people who worry
> about line numbers usually aren't using Emacs properly.
>
> I often use the line number.
Gosh. I turn it off and have always advised people to look for
commands that make it irrelevant.
> If people generally agree with you on any of these points, I will
> agree to change it.
I didn't doubt you'd be amenable to sensible modification. I assumed
people were using customizations which masked the effects of the
defaults which jarred with me. I'm surprised I'm apparently at odds
with everyone else on these things.
I think there should be a way to customize the changed behaviour of
the items in the Lucid menus.
- Re: bad UI defaults, (continued)
Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/04/23
Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/18
- Re: bad UI defaults,
Dave Love <=