[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad UI defaults
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: bad UI defaults |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:18:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Gerd Moellmann) writes:
> That it's customizable doesn't imply it should be the default, of
> course.
Hear, hear.
I really don't understand how anyone could find it easy to read a
character where the edges are drawn over with a straight line of
similar width. To my eye, at least, there are many characters which
are simply indistinguishable that way in one of the blinked states and
somewhat difficult to read in the other.
- Re: bad UI defaults, (continued)
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/04
- Re: bad UI defaults, Kim F. Storm, 2003/09/05
- Re: bad UI defaults, Jan D., 2003/09/05
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/07
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/09
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/06
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/06
Re: bad UI defaults,
Dave Love <=
Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/09/02
- Re: bad UI defaults, Kim F. Storm, 2003/09/03
- Re: bad UI defaults, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/09/03
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/04
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/04
- Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/09/09
- Re: bad UI defaults, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/09/09
- Re: bad UI defaults, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/09/09
- Re: bad UI defaults, Miles Bader, 2003/09/09