[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: etc/sex.6
|
From: |
Lute Kamstra |
|
Subject: |
Re: etc/sex.6 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:54:00 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Daniel Pfeiffer) writes:
> This file does not follow the GNU long option convention.
You are absolutely right; sex grievously violates the GNU Coding
Standards.
> Option -T is not portable outside the Enuched States of America.
Another affront of decency! All good programs, especially sex, should
be as international as possible.
Since you sound like an expert user, would you be willing to write a
fix to make sex conform to the GNU Coding Standards?
Lute.
- etc/sex.6, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2003/10/22
- Re: etc/sex.6,
Lute Kamstra <=
- Re: etc/sex.6, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/23