[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: invisible
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: invisible |
Date: |
28 Feb 2004 19:35:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> question is whether we want to keep that one. The majority (but not
> all) of the problems caused by Stefan's changes concern the case where
> line-move-ignore-invisible is nil. Does a nil value still make sense
Note that those problems were most likely already present (and probably
still are present as well) if you have `display' properties instead of
`invisible' properties. The reason for it is that my change did not
introduce any fundamentally new behavior but only extended a pre-existing
one (move out of `display' and `composition' properties such as images) to
more cases (do the same for `display' overlays and for invisible properties
and overlays).
The main reason for extending the code to the `invisible' property was
precisely so as to make `intangible' less often necessary since
`intangible' tends to introduce significant problems when interacting with
code not specifically written with the `intangible' property in mind.
Stefan