[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diff-yank-handler is evil
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: diff-yank-handler is evil |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:56:34 -0500 |
Maybe a message could warn the user what happened. So if it DWIM in
95% of all cases, and undo fixes the remainng 5%, I think users will
quickly adapt...
first undo => undo reformatting, second undo => undo yank.
I guess we could try that.
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, (continued)
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Jesper Harder, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Jesper Harder, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/29
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/25