Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions

[Jason Rumney]

Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:

>> The reason for adding these aliases is to get clipboard support
>> working out of the box on Windows easily. Even if the codepages are
>> incomplete, it is better than the current situation of assuming
>> latin-1 for the clipboard.
>
> It might be possible to get them (more-or-less) right with
> post-read/pre-write conversions if any additional characters are ones
> Emacs can represent.  It would be good to avoid any incompatibility
> with Emacs 22 anyhow.

I checked Korean, which is the one I am most worried about since
it includes extra precomposed Hangeul, but the extra characters are
all in the gap [0x3400, 0xdfff] that is not covered by current Emacs.