[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:21:24 -0400 |
I do use the feature myself, and in my experience, it's most useful for
C-M-t (because in this case, you are naturally placed "on" the punctuation,
so it works very intuitively and feels more like a bug-fix than a new
feature). For C-M-f and friends, it comes in handy every once in a while,
but nothing too significant.
Ok with me.
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, (continued)
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/21
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/21
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Miles Bader, 2004/09/21
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/21
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/22
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/22
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/24
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan, 2004/09/24
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/25
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode, Stefan, 2004/09/25
- Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode,
Richard Stallman <=