Re: more key bindings for xterm

[Dan Nicolaescu]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

  >     Would it be acceptable to add something like:
  >     (substitute-key-definition [f29] [C-f5] function-key-map) to xterm.el? 
  > 
  > Does any terminal have a real f29 key?

No idea.

  > If not, why not just define function-key-map to map
  > it unconditionally into C-f5?

How about smaller numbers, like f13?  (I think some terminals had
keys up to at least f16)
(S-F1 -> S-F12 are mapped to f13 -> f24)

I'll implement any solution whenever a decision is made to go one way
or another. 

   --dan