[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Elisp manual omission?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Elisp manual omission? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:05:12 -0400 |
At this point, I'd be happy with _any_ line, even not a clear one.
Something like ``let's not document everything'' just doesn't cut it,
sorry.
I wish I could give you the line that you want, but I can't. The
criterion is mostly a matter of how often, and how generally,
something is likely to be useful. But I cannot find the words to
state where the threshold is. It's a matter of "is this going to be
worth the paper it's printed on?"
- Re: Elisp manual omission?, (continued)
- Re: Elisp manual omission?, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/04/23
- Re: Elisp manual omission?, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/23
- Re: Elisp manual omission?, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/04/23
- Re: Elisp manual omission?, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/24
- Re: Elisp manual omission?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/04/24
- Re: Elisp manual omission?, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/24
- Re: Elisp manual omission?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/04/24
- Re: Elisp manual omission?,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Elisp manual omission?, Nick Roberts, 2005/04/19