[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:36:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) |
> A test for an autoloaded function being fboundp will always yield t,
> so I think it's useless to check fboundp as an instrument of
> distinguishing between terminal types. And yet you did use fboundp in
> your original message.
After sleeping a little more, re-read his message.
He uses fboundp to see whether there is a (n autoloaded) function, since
there's not going to be a specific terminal function for each and every
existing terminal. Just like we currently try to load term/$TERM.el but we
detect when the file doesn't exist.
Stefan
- Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, (continued)
- Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/23
- Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/07/25
- Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/26
- Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/07/26
- Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/26
- Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/07/26
- Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/26
- Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/27
Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings, Kenichi Handa, 2005/07/22