[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:00:03 +0900 |
2005/10/26, David Reitter <address@hidden>:
> Another reason not to implement soft line wrapping as actual
> modifications of the buffer.
It's a far from straight-forward change, and certainly nothing that
will happen before emacs is released. Richard generally dislikes the
idea. So if there are problems with longlines mode (which does an
_excellent_ job generally), they should certainly be fixed.
-miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, David Reitter, 2005/10/25
- RE: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, David Reitter, 2005/10/26
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Miles Bader, 2005/10/26
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, David Reitter, 2005/10/26
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, David Reitter, 2005/10/26
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/26
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, David Reitter, 2005/10/27
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Ralf Angeli, 2005/10/27
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, David Reitter, 2005/10/27
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Ralf Angeli, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/27
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, David Reitter, 2005/10/28
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/29