[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:34:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Anyway, regardless of why or whether anyone would use invisible frames, the
> question here is how they should be treated.
They're not treated differently. It's the visible and iconified parts that
are treated differently because a frame that's visible/iconified but on
another display is as good as invisible (it's even more invisible than the
invisible frames since there's no equivalent of make-frame-visible for
those).
Stefan
- Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, (continued)
- Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, John Paul Wallington, 2005/11/06
- Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/06
- Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, John Paul Wallington, 2005/11/06
- RE: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, Drew Adams, 2005/11/06
- Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/06
- RE: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, Drew Adams, 2005/11/06
- Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/07
- RE: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, Drew Adams, 2005/11/07
- Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/07
- RE: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, Drew Adams, 2005/11/07
- Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil,
Stefan Monnier <=
- RE: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, Drew Adams, 2005/11/07
Re: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, John Paul Wallington, 2005/11/06
FW: ibuffer problem with pop-up-frames non-nil, Drew Adams, 2005/11/05