Re: add info about safe-local-variable to describe-variable

[Ken Manheimer]

sorry - i guess i shipped that patch with too little sleep, or
something.  i had attached the prior copy of the ChangeLog (which i
overwrote with the new one in the filesystem, but didn't re-attached
after doing so), and neglected to adjust the version numbers to remove
the CVS tokens i keep in my internal copy, as i usually do.  the
versions attached to this message correct that.

ken

On 5/15/06, Reiner Steib <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15 2006, Ken Manheimer wrote:
>
> > in light of these new realizations, i'm attaching a new allout patch
> > and changelog.  reiner, i really like the compromise of using the
> > simple predicates for safe-local-variable property qualifiers, when
> > available, and falling back to the lambdas when they're not.  this
> > patch includes changes that do that, and also has yet another minor
> > allout fix.
>
> Could you please send a ChangeLog entry that only considers these
> changes?
>
> As the lisp files are synced between different CVS branches, including
> CVS keywords is problematic (often leads to conflicts).  Can we skip
> the hunk introducing "$Revision: ... $"?
>
> Bye, Reiner.
> --
>        ,,,
>       (o o)
> ---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/


--
ken manheimer
address@hidden
http://myriadicity.net

allout-ChangeLog.txt
Description: Text document

allout-patch.txt
Description: Text document