[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: silent PC vs. emacs
|
From: |
Dan Jacobson |
|
Subject: |
Re: silent PC vs. emacs |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 02:43:41 +0800 |
YM> use a non-continuous timer instead of a continuous one.
I hope that will fix it. All I know is I use Debian's emacs-snapshot
downloaded when I go to town every few months, and I have no blinking
cursor, no time in the modeline, and jit-lock-stealth-time is nil.
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, (continued)
Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/04
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/09/04
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs,
Dan Jacobson <=
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/09/04
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/06
Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Jan Djärv, 2006/09/03
Re: silent PC vs. emacs, T. V. Raman, 2006/09/02
Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/03