|
From: | Andreas Roehler |
Subject: | defun-at-point, (thing-at-point 'defun) |
Date: | Sat, 28 Oct 2006 14:42:13 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) |
With cursor inside a functions definition, what should `defun-at-point' resp. (thing-at-point 'defun) return: - the function name - the complete functions corpus What about introducing `functionname-at-point'? Thanks __ Andreas Roehler
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |